-- Hollywood
With this introduction of an anti-gun ideology in the last 30 years there has been a steady production of movies in Hollywood depicting guns in the hands of ordinary people as dangerous and counterproductive and, at the same time, depicting the "bad guys" shooting up a storm every evening on television. Indeed, they seem unable to produce anything else. They lack imagination, maturity and good judgment. Their dialog and plots are ridiculous every evening, frequently depicting women beating the hell out of men in ridiculous hand-to-hand combat.
Hollywood, through an informal agreement with our Government and the anti-gun community, has become an integral part of this problem. They simply can not produce an intelligent and intellectually healthy movie without processing nonsense traveling through the grape-vine circuits or the use of ideology. In my view, Hollywood needs a real education. They need to recognize the difference between reality and nonsense and the responsibility to use information correctly. They need to grow up into responsible and mature adults instead of a bunch of "fruitcakes."
Hollywood, through an informal agreement with our Government and the anti-gun community, has become an integral part of this problem. They simply can not produce an intelligent and intellectually healthy movie without processing nonsense traveling through the grape-vine circuits or the use of ideology. In my view, Hollywood needs a real education. They need to recognize the difference between reality and nonsense and the responsibility to use information correctly. They need to grow up into responsible and mature adults instead of a bunch of "fruitcakes."
Remember in the middle-to-late 1970's to the early 1980's when we could not watch a movie or serial every evening without an anti-gun message in it?
Remember "Hawaii Five-O" or "Adam 12?" Almost every week we could easily find anti-gun messages with an urgent need for "gun-control." In one particularly ignorant edition I can remember seeing Jack Lord, portraying himself as an "expert" on guns, crime and working as a Chief of Police, holding up a Smith & Wesson revolver, possibly the Model 28 or 29, in a way a little old lady might hold up a dirty handkerchief, with his right thumb and right index finger, while describing it as a cheap "Saturday Night Special" and, all the while, demanding stronger gun-control provisions.
It never occurred to this dummy there is no such thing. If so, then he should have identified the companies that make such guns. Think of the insurance liability premiums for anyone making such a piece of junk. How long do you think a company would stay in business?
Now these Hollywood Fruitcakes have, on the most part, gotten away from these messages for gun-control.
Now they have focused their attention on the ideology of "equality" between the sexes. Almost every evening we find movies and prime time shows depicting images of women beating the hell out of men in hand-to-hand combat; women being in charge of several men and talking down to them; calling them "male chauvinist pigs;" or transmitting an anti-male ideological agenda. It sounds suspiciously like a Lesbian anti-male agenda. Read their literature.
Even the entertaining fantasy of "James Bond - 007" has fallen victim to this ideology. His boss is now a woman who continually talks down to him and calls him a "male chauvinist pig." How did she get into that position. Ordinarily, it would take years for anyone to work his way up to the top in that kind of dangerous work. Now we have a woman who got there without the bother of her working all the way up. From the bottom she went to the top without any apparent transition. Men cannot get away with it. Why should a woman? Only in Hollywood do we see such foolishness.
Even Miss Moneypenny now calls him a "male chauvinist pig" when, for years, she was portrayed as a secretary secretly in love with James Bond while flirting with him at every opportunity and, on occasion, entertaining a sexual fantasy of making love to him.
This is foolish nonsense and, unfortunately, we don't have anything in law or social convention to fight against this kind of abuse, namely the abuse of Hollywood using its position to manipulate behavior within the framework of an ideology; such as provisions to prosecute and even to institutionalize such Fruitcakes. They have serious psychiatric issues but too damn stupid to realize it.
They use ideology as a substitute for intelligence!
One suggestion I have for you is to make a telephone call to your local congressman to complain about this transparent attempt on the part of Hollywood to manipulate our behavior. We have an inherent right to be free from people trying to manipulate us, and certainly we do not have to put up with it on television every evening. Entertainment should be entertainment, not a platform for someone's ideology!
Remember "Hawaii Five-O" or "Adam 12?" Almost every week we could easily find anti-gun messages with an urgent need for "gun-control." In one particularly ignorant edition I can remember seeing Jack Lord, portraying himself as an "expert" on guns, crime and working as a Chief of Police, holding up a Smith & Wesson revolver, possibly the Model 28 or 29, in a way a little old lady might hold up a dirty handkerchief, with his right thumb and right index finger, while describing it as a cheap "Saturday Night Special" and, all the while, demanding stronger gun-control provisions.
It never occurred to this dummy there is no such thing. If so, then he should have identified the companies that make such guns. Think of the insurance liability premiums for anyone making such a piece of junk. How long do you think a company would stay in business?
Now these Hollywood Fruitcakes have, on the most part, gotten away from these messages for gun-control.
Now they have focused their attention on the ideology of "equality" between the sexes. Almost every evening we find movies and prime time shows depicting images of women beating the hell out of men in hand-to-hand combat; women being in charge of several men and talking down to them; calling them "male chauvinist pigs;" or transmitting an anti-male ideological agenda. It sounds suspiciously like a Lesbian anti-male agenda. Read their literature.
Even the entertaining fantasy of "James Bond - 007" has fallen victim to this ideology. His boss is now a woman who continually talks down to him and calls him a "male chauvinist pig." How did she get into that position. Ordinarily, it would take years for anyone to work his way up to the top in that kind of dangerous work. Now we have a woman who got there without the bother of her working all the way up. From the bottom she went to the top without any apparent transition. Men cannot get away with it. Why should a woman? Only in Hollywood do we see such foolishness.
Even Miss Moneypenny now calls him a "male chauvinist pig" when, for years, she was portrayed as a secretary secretly in love with James Bond while flirting with him at every opportunity and, on occasion, entertaining a sexual fantasy of making love to him.
This is foolish nonsense and, unfortunately, we don't have anything in law or social convention to fight against this kind of abuse, namely the abuse of Hollywood using its position to manipulate behavior within the framework of an ideology; such as provisions to prosecute and even to institutionalize such Fruitcakes. They have serious psychiatric issues but too damn stupid to realize it.
They use ideology as a substitute for intelligence!
One suggestion I have for you is to make a telephone call to your local congressman to complain about this transparent attempt on the part of Hollywood to manipulate our behavior. We have an inherent right to be free from people trying to manipulate us, and certainly we do not have to put up with it on television every evening. Entertainment should be entertainment, not a platform for someone's ideology!
posted by Alvah Buckmore, Jr., at 11:27 AM
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home